Giulia Muggeo, Ekaterina Ganskaya

We Are Spirits in the Material World

Introduction

We are spirits in the material world. Explore the profound dichotomy between spiritual existence and the material world. Delve into philosophical insights on consciousness, reality, and human nature.

Abstract

Review

The submission presents an intriguing title, "We Are Spirits in the Material World," which hints at philosophical, metaphysical, or perhaps psychological explorations of human existence within a physical reality. However, a substantive review of the proposed work is rendered impossible due to the complete absence of an abstract. The provided abstract field is entirely blank, offering no information whatsoever about the paper's scope, methodology, findings, or conclusions. Without this fundamental component, any assessment of the paper's originality, rigor, relevance, or contribution to the field is purely speculative and cannot be conducted. The abstract serves as the cornerstone of any academic paper, providing a concise summary that allows reviewers, editors, and readers to quickly grasp the essence of the research. It typically outlines the research question, the theoretical framework or background, the methods employed, the key results, and the main conclusions and implications. Its omission here represents a critical deficiency, preventing any preliminary evaluation of the paper's scientific merit, its methodological soundness, or its potential impact. It also raises concerns about the completeness and readiness of the manuscript for peer review. In light of the fundamental lack of an abstract, this submission, as presented, cannot be properly evaluated by the peer review process. An abstract is not merely a formality; it is an essential window into the research, guiding initial assessment and informing reviewer assignment. Therefore, I recommend that this submission be immediately rejected or, at minimum, returned to the author as incomplete. A full, comprehensive abstract detailing the research scope, methods, results, and conclusions must be provided before the paper can even enter the review pipeline for consideration.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.