Jens Halfwassen

Warum ist die negative Theologie für monotheistische Religionen attraktiv? Überlegungen zur Platonismusrezeption in den abrahamitischen Religionen

Introduction

Warum ist die negative theologie für monotheistische religionen attraktiv? Überlegungen zur platonismusrezeption in den abrahamitischen religionen. Erfahren Sie, warum negative Theologie für monotheistische Religionen attraktiv ist. Eine Untersuchung der Platonismusrezeption in den abrahamitischen Glaubensrichtungen.

Abstract

-

Review

This submission presents a highly intriguing and intellectually stimulating title: "Warum ist die negative Theologie für monotheistische Religionen attraktiv? Überlegungen zur Platonismusrezeption in den abrahamitischen Religionen." This promises a deep dive into the historical and philosophical underpinnings of theological thought within Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, exploring the enduring appeal of negative theology and its conceptual links to Platonic philosophy. The topic is undeniably relevant for scholars of religious studies, philosophy of religion, and intellectual history, offering the potential for significant insights into how transcendent divine concepts have been articulated and understood across these traditions. However, a fundamental component for any peer review, the abstract, is conspicuously absent. This omission critically impairs the ability to provide a comprehensive and fair assessment of the work. Without an abstract, it is impossible to gauge the paper's specific scope, its methodological approach, the particular aspects of Platonism or negative theology being explored, or the primary arguments and conclusions presented. A reviewer cannot discern whether the paper focuses on specific historical periods, key figures, or a comparative theoretical framework, nor can they evaluate the originality of its contribution or its engagement with existing scholarship. To facilitate a proper review, an abstract is essential. For a paper with such a compelling title, an ideal abstract would clearly delineate the central thesis regarding the attractiveness of negative theology, specify which Abrahamic traditions (or combination thereof) are the focus, and outline the particular aspects of Platonism's reception being examined. It should also state the methodology employed (e.g., historical analysis, textual exegesis, philosophical argumentation) and succinctly summarize the main arguments or findings that address the core question posed in the title. This vital information is necessary for evaluating the paper's potential impact, rigor, and suitability for publication.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.