Nestan Lomaia

Philosophical Thinking and Gender Issues

Introduction

Philosophical thinking and gender issues. Explore 21st-century philosophical thinking on gender issues. Analyze its influence on phenomenology, subjectivity, and re-evaluating traditional dichotomies.

Abstract

The task of philosophy in the 21st century is to overcome antitheticality both in the answers to the "eternal" philosophical questions and in their formulation. The traditional relationship between the general and the individual, the individual and society, the possibility and reality, the project and its implementation, the new and the old, intuition and rationality, expression and aggressive means, male and female becomes in the newest philosophy, first of all, a gender theme, in relation to which a new style of philosophical thinking is formed. Gender studies influenced such philosophical schools as phenomenology, the logic of the development of its main ideas. Husserl, Merleau-Ponty, St. George, Heidegger focused the idea of ​​phenomenological research on bodily experience, meaning, significance, the language of expression or expressiveness itself. Various concepts of gender studies try to give an analytical study of subjectivity. Some of them are close to feminist issues, others are guided by the trends of the latest philosophy.

Review

This paper, "Philosophical Thinking and Gender Issues," outlines an ambitious project for contemporary philosophy, asserting that the task of the 21st century is to overcome traditional "antitheticality" in philosophical inquiry. The abstract positions gender as a central theme in this paradigm shift, arguing that it fosters a "new style of philosophical thinking" capable of transcending binary oppositions across various fundamental philosophical questions, from the general and individual to intuition and rationality, and notably, male and female. This proposition suggests a significant contribution to understanding the evolving landscape of philosophical thought and its engagement with societal issues. The abstract highlights the paper's intention to explore how gender studies have influenced major philosophical schools, specifically citing phenomenology and its trajectory through figures like Husserl, Merleau-Ponty, and Heidegger. It suggests that these philosophers' focus on bodily experience, meaning, significance, and expressiveness can be re-examined or understood anew through a gendered lens. The paper intends to provide an "analytical study of subjectivity" within various concepts of gender studies, drawing a distinction between those aligned with feminist issues and others guided by broader trends in "latest philosophy," thus indicating a nuanced approach to the field. While the abstract presents a compelling and timely argument, the scope of its claims will require meticulous development within the full paper. A crucial element will be to precisely demonstrate *how* the "gender theme" actively overcomes the identified antitheticalities, rather than simply becoming another category of analysis. The assertion of gender studies' influence on classical phenomenologists, some of whom predate contemporary gender theory, necessitates careful historical and theoretical argumentation to avoid anachronism and establish clear lines of connection or re-interpretation. Furthermore, clarification regarding the inclusion of "St. George" alongside prominent phenomenologists would be beneficial for a broader philosophical readership. Detailing the specific "various concepts of gender studies" and their unique contributions to the analytical study of subjectivity, beyond the general distinction provided, would also strengthen the paper's overall impact.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.