María D. R. Domínguez Carrasco, Tapio Salo, Riikka Keskinen, Johanna Suomi

Comparison of the effects of bio-based and mineral fertiliser use on heavy metals dietary exposure in six European countries

Introduction

Comparison of the effects of bio-based and mineral fertiliser use on heavy metals dietary exposure in six european countries . Compare bio-based & mineral fertilizers' effects on heavy metal (As, Cd, Ni, Pb) dietary exposure in 6 European countries. Study finds bio-based options generally safe, not increasing exposure compared to conventional superphosphate.

Abstract

This study compared the effects of using bio-based fertilisers (BBFs) of high (BBFH) or low (BBFL) metal content with conventional mineral superphosphate (SP) fertilisation on dietary exposure of arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), nickel (Ni) and lead (Pb), in Finland, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, and Spain. We estimated changes in the metal content of the following crops: wheat, barley, oat, rye, potato, carrot, sunflower seed, and maize following 100-year scenarios of fertilization with the different products. To estimate changes in chronic dietary exposure to metals via food, we used available national data of food consumption and metal content in target crops. Our results showed low changes to current chronic dietary exposure after using BBFs. Exceedance of the maximum allowed levels of Cd and Pb in food (EU 2023/915) was more rare with low-Cd BBF than with SP mineral fertilizer. Only the BBFH slightly increased the dietary exposure to Cd, although similarly to SP. In conclusion, the studied BBFs did not increase dietary exposure to heavy metals, especially compared with the use of conventional SP mineral fertiliser.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.