Moch. Rifqi Mei Redha, Suswanta Suswanta, Ridho Al-Hamdi

ANALYSIS OF MEDIA REPORT FRAMING ON JOKOWI DYNASTY POLITICS IN THE 2024 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

Introduction

Analysis of media report framing on jokowi dynasty politics in the 2024 presidential election. Analyze media framing of Jokowi's dynasty politics in the 2024 Indonesian election. Study uncovers negative reporting, Gibran's role, and Anwar Usman's ethics violation in news.

Abstract

The issue of the Jokowi political dynasty is a trending topic in the 2024 presidential election. Media reporting tends to lead to negative reporting, so researchers differentiate between positive, neutral, and negative framing from the various sources selected. This research aims to look at media framing in providing a view of the politics of the Jokowi dynasty in the 2024 presidential election. The method used is a literature review analysis approach with data sources from news media Antara.news, Kompas.com, and Suara.com. The analysis tools used in this research are Vosviewers and Nvivo 12 Plus. This study found that President Jokowi also provided support to his sons Gibran Rakabuming Raka and Anwar Usman, as chairman of the Constitutional Court (MK), was proven to have violated ethics by giving a decision regarding the age limit for candidacy. This can be the basis for future research in building perspectives and uncovering complexities.

Review

This study tackles a highly pertinent and politically sensitive topic in Indonesia: the media framing of "Jokowi dynasty politics" in the lead-up to the 2024 presidential election. The abstract clearly identifies a relevant problem, noting the tendency towards negative reporting and aiming to differentiate between positive, neutral, and negative framing across selected media outlets. This objective is well-defined and holds significant interest for scholars of political communication and Indonesian studies, promising valuable insights into how influential narratives are constructed around contentious political issues. Methodologically, the paper proposes a "literature review analysis approach" of news media from Antara.news, Kompas.com, and Suara.com, utilizing Vosviewers and Nvivo 12 Plus. While the selection of diverse media sources is commendable, the term "literature review analysis approach" could benefit from greater precision, as it typically refers to a review of existing academic works, not primary news data. It would be beneficial to clarify if this is a content analysis, discourse analysis, or a specific framing analysis methodology, and to detail the exact timeframe of data collection and the criteria for selecting news articles from these outlets. Furthermore, while the tools (Vosviewers for network analysis and Nvivo for qualitative coding) are powerful, the abstract does not elaborate on the specific analytical framework used to distinguish "positive, neutral, and negative framing," which is central to the study's objective. The presented finding, stating that "President Jokowi also provided support to his sons Gibran Rakabuming Raka and Anwar Usman, as chairman of the Constitutional Court (MK), was proven to have violated ethics by giving a decision regarding the age limit for candidacy," appears more as a factual summary of reported events rather than an explicit articulation of *media framing*. For a study focused on framing, the abstract should ideally highlight *how* different media framed these events, what specific linguistic or thematic elements constituted the "negative," "positive," or "neutral" frames, and the prevalence of these frames across the chosen sources. The current conclusion, suggesting this "can be the basis for future research," is rather generic. To strengthen the abstract, it should succinctly articulate the key insights derived from the framing analysis itself, demonstrating how the study uniquely contributes to understanding the complexities of media representation in Indonesian political discourse.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.