Dmitri Muhammad Rifanda, M. A. L. Parama, Teuku Muhammad Haykal Putra, Wishnu Aditya Widodo

When Positive Ischemic Response on Treadmill Test Implies Otherwise: One Overlooked Pitfall on TMT

Introduction

When positive ischemic response on treadmill test implies otherwise: one overlooked pitfall on tmt. Errata: Correcting an incorrect DOI found in the PDF for 'Positive Ischemic Response on Treadmill Test'. The correct DOI is 10.30701/ijc.1197.

Abstract

In “When Positive Ischemic Response on Treadmill Test Implies Otherwise: One Overlooked Pitfall on TMT” (Indonesian Journal of Cardiology, 43(1), 30-6. https://doi.org/10.30701/ijc.1197), there is an error noted. An error has been found in the PDF version of this article. The DOI printed in the PDF is incorrect. The correct DOI is https://doi.org/10.30701/ijc.1197. The error occurs only in the PDF; the DOI listed in the article metadata is already correct. The publisher apologizes for any inconvenience caused by this error.DOI of original article: https://doi.org/10.30701/ijc.1197

Review

The provided "abstract" is not a summary of the article's scientific content but rather an erratum notice concerning an incorrect DOI printed in the PDF version of the paper. Therefore, a traditional review assessing the methodology, results, or conclusions of the research is not possible based on the supplied information. The notice from the Indonesian Journal of Cardiology highlights a typographical error, which, while minor in content, is important for accurate citation and discoverability of the original publication. Despite the absence of a content abstract, the article's title, "When Positive Ischemic Response on Treadmill Test Implies Otherwise: One Overlooked Pitfall on TMT," strongly suggests a clinically relevant contribution to cardiology. It promises to address a critical nuance in the interpretation of treadmill test (TMT) results, particularly when a seemingly "positive ischemic response" might mislead clinicians. Such insights are invaluable for enhancing diagnostic precision, preventing misdiagnosis or inappropriate interventions, and refining clinical decision-making protocols related to ischemic heart disease. Given the title's potential, the original article likely offers a significant discussion or case series illustrating circumstances where conventional TMT interpretation requires re-evaluation. While the current review is limited to acknowledging the erratum, the theme of the actual paper appears highly pertinent for cardiologists, internal medicine specialists, and trainees involved in cardiac stress testing. The publisher's prompt correction of the DOI error, though not part of the scientific discourse, underscores a commitment to maintaining accurate journal metadata, which is essential for scholarly communication and academic integrity.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.