Julie Sascia Mewes, Estrid Sorensen

The Things to Come – Introduction

Introduction

The things to come – introduction. Discover the foundational concepts of 'The Things to Come' in this introductory overview. Prepare for future insights and a deeper understanding.

Abstract

Introduction

Review

The submitted title, "The Things to Come – Introduction," is intriguing, suggesting a forward-looking piece that might explore future trends or serve as an opening to a broader discussion. However, the immediate challenge for review arises from the abstract, which consists solely of the word "Introduction." This singular term creates significant ambiguity, making it impossible to ascertain the article's specific focus, scope, or intended contribution. It is unclear whether this submission *is* an introduction to a larger work, an article *about* the concept of introductions, or a standalone paper that happens to be introductory in nature. A fundamental purpose of an abstract is to provide a concise yet comprehensive summary of an article's content, including its objectives, methodology (if applicable), key arguments, and main conclusions. Regrettably, the abstract provided fails to fulfill any of these critical requirements. It offers no insight into the research questions addressed, the theoretical framework employed, any empirical data presented, or the analytical approach taken. Consequently, it is impossible for a reviewer to assess the originality, rigor, relevance, or potential impact of this submission within its academic field. The complete absence of substantive information prevents any meaningful evaluation of its scholarly merit. For this submission to be considered for review, the author must provide a comprehensive and informative abstract that clearly articulates the article's specific aims, the core topics or arguments presented, and its intended contribution to the existing literature. If this piece is indeed an introduction to a forthcoming series, special issue, or book chapter, this context must be explicitly stated and briefly summarized within the abstract. Additionally, the title itself might benefit from refinement to more precisely reflect the article's specific content if it is intended as a standalone paper. Without a complete and illuminating abstract, the work remains unreviewable and, in its current form, would typically be subject to immediate desk rejection.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.