Samsul AR, Hendi Sugianto, Sulhan Sulhan

The Role of Santri to Against Hoaxes

Introduction

The role of santri to against hoaxes . Explore Santri's crucial role in combating hoaxes in Madura through literacy movements, pesantren websites, and cyber jihad, fostering public awareness and promoting peaceful Islamic teachings.

Abstract

Against hoaxes, everyone's responsibilities A hoax is part of the crime that must be fought because it is troubling the public. The Santries have an obligation to against hoaxes. Through the literacy movement, the socialists can close the gaps in the viral hoax. The role of Santri in shaping the literacy movement has enabled the community to become aware of the knowledge provided by Santri through the media. The use of the boarding school website as part of the media to actualize Santri’s ideas on the Islamic teachings that are rahmah is part of cyber jihad. In addition, announcing activities such as classical book study, congregational prayer, discussion, and so on is part of introducing to the global world that Islam is a friendly religion that can be spread through the role of students at the boarding school. This research focuses on an analysis document on social media of pesantren, where santries are the official media of pesantren in Madura.

Review

This paper addresses a highly relevant and timely topic concerning the proliferation of hoaxes and the potential role of Indonesian *santri* (Islamic boarding school students) in combating them. The premise of utilizing *pesantren* (Islamic boarding school) websites and *santri*-led literacy movements for "cyber jihad" against misinformation, while simultaneously promoting a peaceful image of Islam, is both intriguing and potentially impactful. The focus on practical activities like classical book studies and discussions as content for global outreach demonstrates an interesting approach to digital engagement and community awareness. However, the abstract presents several areas that require significant clarification to assess the robustness of the proposed research. The methodology is described vaguely as "an analysis document on social media of pesantren, where santries are the official media of pesantren in Madura." This statement lacks precision regarding the type of "analysis document," the specific social media platforms, the nature of the "santries as official media," and the analytical framework employed. Without details on data collection, sampling strategy, and the analytical methods (e.g., content analysis, discourse analysis), it is difficult to evaluate the study's scientific rigor or replicability. Furthermore, the abstract would benefit from a clearer definition of "literacy movement" in this context and how *santri* specifically "shape" it. To strengthen this work, the authors should significantly elaborate on their methodology, providing clear details on the data sources, the specific social media content analyzed, and the analytical techniques used to interpret the "documents." A clearer articulation of the research questions and how the proposed methods will address them is also crucial. Defining key terms like "cyber jihad" within the specific context of this study would enhance clarity. Despite these points for improvement, the paper holds considerable potential to contribute to our understanding of digital literacy, religious education, and counter-misinformation strategies in Indonesia, provided the underlying research design is more thoroughly explicated.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.