Dharma Juliya Ardiansyah, Sri Afriani, Riana Wulandari Ananto Ananto

PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA BAGI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENYALAHGUNAAN KEPEMILIKAN AIRSOFT GUN DI LINGKUNGAN MASYARAKAT SIPIL

Introduction

Pertanggungjawaban pidana bagi pelaku tindak pidana penyalahgunaan kepemilikan airsoft gun di lingkungan masyarakat sipil. Kaji pertanggungjawaban pidana penyalahgunaan airsoft gun di masyarakat sipil. Analisis sanksi hukum bagi kepemilikan tanpa izin yang membahayakan keselamatan jiwa.

Abstract

Airsoft gun merupakan game menembak yang notabennya adalah serangkaian simulasi kegiatan dalam dunia militer maupun kepolisian, dimana bentuk menyerupai asli.Tujuan penelitian ini, untuk mengetahui pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana penyalahgunaan kepemilikan Airsoft gun di lingkungan masyarakat sipil. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini, yaitu normatif (kepustakaan) dengan menggunakan data sekunder yang diambil dari peraturan perundang-undangan, buku-buku, jurnal, artikel yang berkaitan dengan kepemilikan airsoft gun dan senjata api. Selanjutnya terhadap data sekunder dianalisis secara kualitatif untuk mendapatkan kesimpulan. Hasil penelitian dalam skripsi ini, Pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana penyalahgunaan kepemilikan airsoft gun di lingkungan masyarakat sipil dalam putusan perkara Nomor 434/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Jkt.Utr, Muhammad Jamaludin bin Yusuf dapat dikatakan mampu mempertanggungjawabkan perbuatannya dalam kepemilikan airsoft gun tanpa ijin di lingkungan masyarakat sipil. Pertanggungjawaban pidana terhadap pelaku tindak pidana penyalahgunaan kepemilikan Airsoft gun di lingkungan masyarakat sipil yaitu kepemilikan airsoft gun tanpa izin dan melakukan jual beli airsoft gun dapat membahayakan keselamatan jiwa orang lain, sehingga terhadap pelaku dapat dikenakan sanksi pidana sebagai bentuk penegakan hukum yang tegas.

Review

The paper, "PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA BAGI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENYALAHGUNAAN KEPEMILIKAN AIRSOFT GUN DI LINGKUNGAN MASYARAKAT SIPIL" (Criminal Liability for Perpetrators of Criminal Acts of Misuse of Airsoft Gun Ownership in Civilian Society), addresses a highly relevant and pressing legal issue concerning the regulation and misuse of airsoft guns. Given that airsoft guns are realistic replicas used in simulations of military and police activities, their potential for misuse in civilian hands poses significant legal and safety challenges. The primary objective of this research is clearly stated: to ascertain the criminal liability for individuals who misuse airsoft gun ownership within civilian environments. Employing a normative (kepustakaan) legal research methodology, the study draws extensively on secondary data sources, including relevant legislation, academic books, journals, and articles pertaining to airsoft gun and firearm ownership. This approach, complemented by qualitative analysis, aims to synthesize a comprehensive legal understanding. The findings of the research affirm that criminal liability can indeed be established for perpetrators of airsoft gun misuse. A notable illustration is provided through the reference to Case Number 434/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Jkt.Utr, involving Muhammad Jamaludin bin Yusuf, where the individual was found capable of bearing responsibility for unauthorized airsoft gun possession. The study underscores that both unauthorized ownership and the sale of airsoft guns can significantly endanger public safety, thereby warranting strict criminal sanctions as a crucial aspect of law enforcement. Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution by highlighting the legal ramifications of airsoft gun misuse in civilian society and advocating for rigorous enforcement. Its strength lies in identifying a specific legal problem and confirming the applicability of criminal sanctions, exemplified through a concrete case reference. While the abstract effectively outlines the problem, methodology, and key findings, a more detailed elaboration on the specific legal statutes governing such liability and a deeper analysis of the case study's legal reasoning would further enhance its scholarly impact. Nevertheless, it provides a solid foundation for understanding the legal landscape surrounding airsoft guns and the imperative for accountability.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.