Ario Maulana

Peran Blue Hydrogen dalam Mendukung Target NZE dan Kebijakan Kendaraan Listrik di Indonesia

Introduction

Peran blue hydrogen dalam mendukung target nze dan kebijakan kendaraan listrik di indonesia. Peran hidrogen biru (gas alam + CCUS) sebagai jembatan pragmatis untuk target Net Zero Emissions 2060 Indonesia. Analisis biaya & sinergi dengan kebijakan kendaraan listrik FCEV. Solusi energi berkelanjutan.

Abstract

Indonesia menghadapi tantangan ganda dalam transisi energi: memenuhi permintaan energi yang terus meningkat sekaligus mencapai target Net Zero Emissions (NZE) pada tahun 2060. Sementara hidrogen hijau dianggap sebagai solusi ideal jangka panjang, biaya produksi yang tinggi dan ketergantungan pada infrastruktur energi terbarukan yang belum matang menjadi kendala signifikan. Penelitian ini menganalisis peran strategis hidrogen biru yang diproduksi dari gas alam dengan teknologi Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) sebagai teknologi jembatan yang pragmatis dan layak secara ekonomi. Melalui pendekatan analisis tekno-ekonomi dan kebijakan kualitatif, studi ini mengevaluasi kelayakan ekonomi hidrogen biru dibandingkan sumber energi lain, sinerginya dengan kebijakan pengembangan kendaraan listrik nasional, dan keselarasan dengan peta jalan energi Indonesia. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa hidrogen biru memiliki keunggulan biaya yang signifikan ($1.00 - $2.80/kg) dibandingkan hidrogen hijau ($3.00 - $8.00/kg), memungkinkannya untuk diimplementasikan dalam skala besar dalam waktu dekat. Selain itu, hidrogen biru dapat mendukung diversifikasi teknologi di sektor transportasi melalui Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEV), melengkapi program Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) yang ada, dan meningkatkan ketahanan energi nasional.

Review

This paper, "Peran Blue Hydrogen dalam Mendukung Target NZE dan Kebijakan Kendaraan Listrik di Indonesia," addresses a highly pertinent and critical issue concerning Indonesia's dual challenge of meeting escalating energy demand while pursuing its Net Zero Emissions (NZE) target by 2060. The study strategically positions blue hydrogen, derived from natural gas with Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) technology, as a pragmatic and economically viable bridge solution. By employing a techno-economic and qualitative policy analysis, the research sets out to evaluate blue hydrogen's feasibility, its synergy with national electric vehicle policies, and its alignment with Indonesia's broader energy roadmap. A significant strength of this research lies in its realistic assessment of the energy transition landscape, acknowledging the immediate hurdles associated with green hydrogen's high production costs and immature renewable energy infrastructure. The abstract clearly highlights a compelling techno-economic advantage, with blue hydrogen production costs estimated between $1.00 - $2.80/kg, substantially lower than green hydrogen's $3.00 - $8.00/kg. This cost differential is crucial for enabling large-scale, near-term implementation, positioning blue hydrogen as a credible enabler for decarbonization. Furthermore, the paper adeptly connects blue hydrogen to the national transportation sector, proposing its role in diversifying vehicle technologies through Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEVs) to complement existing Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) programs, thereby enhancing national energy resilience. While the abstract presents a strong case for blue hydrogen as a transitional fuel, a more detailed exploration in the full paper of the long-term sustainability implications and potential public perception challenges associated with continued reliance on fossil fuel derivatives, even with CCUS, would be valuable. Future work could also delve deeper into the specific regulatory, geological, and financial frameworks required for robust CCUS implementation in the Indonesian context, including a thorough risk assessment. Additionally, a more explicit discussion on the anticipated timeline and criteria for transitioning *from* blue hydrogen *to* green hydrogen as renewable energy infrastructure matures would further solidify its role as a temporary "bridge" rather than a prolonged solution.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.