Kalya Natriswa Putri Kinanthi, Khairunnida Rahma

OVERVIEW OF DYSMENORRHEA SEVERITY AND MANAGEMENT CHOICES AMONG FEMALE MEDICAL STUDENTS AT UNIVERSITAS MULAWARMAN: THE 2024 COHORT

Introduction

Overview of dysmenorrhea severity and management choices among female medical students at universitas mulawarman: the 2024 cohort. Investigate dysmenorrhea severity and preferred management strategies among female medical students at Universitas Mulawarman. Findings show mild to moderate pain, with a preference for non-pharmacological methods like relaxation.

Abstract

Dysmenorrhea is a highly prevalent gynecological complaint that significantly interferes with daily activities. This study aimed to investigate the severity levels of dysmenorrhea and treatment preferences among female medical students from the 2024 cohort at Universitas Mulawarman. A descriptive quantitative design was employed using a questionnaire administered to 50 respondents, with data analyzed through frequency distribution and percentage methods. The results showed that most respondents experienced non-severe dysmenorrhea, with mild pain reported by 46% and moderate pain by 42% of participants; however, dysmenorrhea still disrupted daily activities in 64% of the students. Regarding management strategies, the majority preferred non-pharmacological approaches, particularly relaxation techniques (36%) and drinking mineral water (20%). In conclusion, although dysmenorrhea among the students was generally mild to moderate, management preferences predominantly favored simple, non-pharmacological interventions.

Review

The study "Overview of Dysmenorrhea Severity and Management Choices Among Female Medical Students at Universitas Mulawarman: The 2024 Cohort" addresses a pertinent and widespread health issue among women. Focusing on medical students provides a unique demographic for investigation, as their training might influence their perceptions and management strategies. The descriptive quantitative design, employing a questionnaire for data collection, is suitable for the stated objective of outlining dysmenorrhea severity and treatment preferences. However, the sample size of 50 respondents, while providing initial insights, should be noted as a limitation affecting the broader generalizability of the findings. The key findings present an interesting contrast: while most respondents experienced non-severe dysmenorrhea (46% mild, 42% moderate), a significant proportion (64%) reported that it still disrupted their daily activities. This observation underscores that even seemingly mild or moderate pain can have a substantial functional impact, challenging the simplistic interpretation of severity. In terms of management, the strong preference for non-pharmacological interventions, particularly relaxation techniques (36%) and drinking mineral water (20%), is noteworthy. This suggests a tendency towards simple, accessible self-care methods, potentially reflecting a lack of awareness, perceived efficacy, or accessibility issues regarding pharmacological options. Overall, this study offers valuable preliminary data on dysmenorrhea experiences and management choices within a specific student population. Its main contribution is highlighting the persistent disruption caused by dysmenorrhea, even when perceived as non-severe, and the prevalent reliance on basic non-pharmacological approaches. Future research could benefit from a larger, more diverse sample, potentially incorporating qualitative components to explore the underlying reasons for specific management choices and perceived efficacy in greater depth. Investigating the correlation between medical knowledge, attitudes towards different treatments, and actual management practices among future healthcare professionals would also provide a richer understanding.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.