Carlos M. CIAPPINA

¡No al adoctrinamiento, sí al pensamiento único!

Introduction

¡no al adoctrinamiento, sí al pensamiento único!. Analiza el adoctrinamiento y el 'pensamiento único' en el debate público. Una crítica a la conformidad intelectual y las discusiones que moldean nuestra sociedad.

Abstract

En nuestro país cada tanto se renuevan sorprendentes debates y discu-siones que no se dan en ningún lugar del mundo –y no es precisamente un hecho para ufanarse-

Review

The submitted title, "¡No al adoctrinamiento, sí al pensamiento único!" immediately establishes a highly provocative and paradoxical premise. This stark juxtaposition, seemingly rejecting indoctrination while advocating for a singular mode of thought, raises significant questions about the paper's underlying philosophical stance or its intended satirical nature. As a title, it successfully captures attention, yet it also risks alienating readers if the subsequent content does not adequately explore and resolve this inherent tension. A robust academic work would need to meticulously define "adoctrinamiento" and "pensamiento único" and then rigorously argue for this counter-intuitive position, or clarify its critical intent. Regrettably, the accompanying abstract provides almost no substantive information to elucidate the provocative title or the article's actual contribution. Its extreme brevity merely sets a vague, localized context, referencing "surprising debates and discussions that do not occur anywhere else in the world – and it is not exactly a fact to boast about-" within an unspecified "our country." While this hints at a critical analysis of national intellectual or political discourse, it fails entirely to articulate the paper's scope, methodology, key arguments, theoretical framework, or expected findings. An abstract's primary role is to concisely summarize the essence of the research, allowing readers to grasp its purpose and relevance; this one unfortunately falls short of that fundamental requirement. Based solely on the title and this minimal abstract, it is impossible to evaluate the academic rigor, originality, or potential impact of the submission. To be considered for publication, a thorough revision of the abstract is imperative. The author must expand it significantly to clearly outline the research question, the specific context ("our country"), the methods employed, the core arguments advanced, and how the paper addresses the challenging relationship between "adoctrinamiento" and "pensamiento único" implied by the title. Without a comprehensive and informative abstract, the article's potential value remains entirely opaque, making proper peer review and subsequent reader engagement highly improbable.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.