Marco Veglia

Carducci al Pontelungo

Introduction

Carducci al pontelungo. Esplora la fortuna di Carducci e le sue implicazioni politiche dal Risorgimento al dopoguerra, analizzando il caso Dreyfus e le testimonianze di Bacchelli.

Abstract

Il saggio ripercorre, attraverso il caso Dreyfus e le testimonianze che ne lasciarono Giuseppe e Riccardo Bacchelli, un paragrafo della fortuna di Carducci considerato nelle sue risonanze e implicazioni, vuoi durante il tardo Risorgimento bolognese, vuoi durante il periodo fascista (nell’Italia del Diavolo al Pontelungo), vuoi nel secondo dopoguerra, quando ancora il retaggio di Enotrio Romano nutriva e orientava scelte politiche democratiche e liberali. La sezione Carducciana dei Saggi critici di Riccardo Bacchelli, esaminata per ciò che riguarda la vicenda di Dreyfus e la difesa che ne fece Zola, riesce infine di particolare importanza per intendere di quali fermenti liberali fosse capace il carduccianesimo.

Review

The article, "Carducci al Pontelungo," offers a fascinating and intricate exploration of Giosuè Carducci's complex reception and enduring legacy in Italian intellectual and political life. Moving beyond a simple biographical or literary analysis, the essay skillfully traces a specific trajectory of Carducci's *fortuna* through several pivotal historical moments. The abstract indicates a particular focus on the resonances and implications of Carducci's work, from the late Bolognese Risorgimento through the Fascist era—specifically referencing Riccardo Bacchelli's *Diavolo al Pontelungo*—and into the post-World War II period, where his "Enotrio Romano" persona continued to shape democratic and liberal political discourse. This broad temporal scope, coupled with specific case studies, promises a nuanced understanding of a towering figure in Italian letters. A significant strength of this study lies in its innovative use of the Dreyfus Affair as a lens through which to re-evaluate Carducci's influence, particularly as filtered through the testimonies of Giuseppe and Riccardo Bacchelli. The abstract highlights the crucial role of Riccardo Bacchelli's "Saggi critici," noting its particular importance for discerning the "liberal ferments" inherent in Carduccianism, especially in relation to Zola's defense in the Dreyfus case. This approach is commendable, as it moves beyond static interpretations to reveal the dynamic, often contradictory, ways in which Carducci's intellectual heritage was invoked, reinterpreted, and harnessed for diverse political ends. By connecting Carducci's legacy to specific historical controversies and intellectual debates, the paper promises to shed new light on the plasticity of cultural influence. Overall, "Carducci al Pontelungo" appears to be a highly original and valuable contribution to the fields of Italian literary studies, intellectual history, and the study of political culture. By meticulously dissecting how Carducci's image and ideas were appropriated and reconfigured across different eras—from supporting liberal democratic choices to being entangled with the Fascist period—the essay offers a compelling narrative about the intricate relationship between literature, politics, and national identity. It not only deepens our understanding of Carducci's multifaceted *fortuna* but also provides fresh insights into the Bacchelli brothers' engagement with their literary heritage, ultimately enriching our comprehension of the complex intellectual currents that shaped modern Italy.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.