Heikki Savikko, Joonas Hokkanen, Heikki Metsäranta, Juha Honkatukia, Mika Haapanen, Timo Tohmo, Eva Pongracz

A methodological framework to assess the employment impacts of transport infrastructure construction

Introduction

A methodological framework to assess the employment impacts of transport infrastructure construction. Assess employment impacts of transport infrastructure construction with a new methodological framework. This study evaluates ex-ante methods and finds limited national net employment benefits.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to suggest a methodological evaluation framework for assessing the employment impacts of transport infrastructure construction. The applicability and usability of different ex-ante employment impact assessment methods were evaluated. Commonly, the employment impacts during construction are used as a justification for investment decisions. In this study, we tested three commonly used methods to estimate the employment impacts during the construction of three real-life case studies and compared the results to the known impacts of these projects. The results indicate that transport infrastructure construction is not an effective means of employment policy nationwide. This is partly due to insufficient labor supply in the infrastructure engineering and construction industries. A higher employment rate on a national level would require an increase in labor supply instead of an increase in labor demand. However, even though the national net impact on employment was close to zero, the gross regional impact on employment would still be useful information in project planning. The methodological framework, presented in this paper, helps to manage the employment impacts of transport infrastructure construction in a proper context.

Review

This paper addresses a critical, often oversimplified, aspect of infrastructure planning: the assessment of employment impacts from transport infrastructure construction. The authors aim to introduce a robust methodological framework for ex-ante evaluation, recognizing that employment generation is frequently cited as a primary justification for such investments. By evaluating the applicability and usability of existing assessment methods and testing three common approaches against real-life case studies with known outcomes, the study provides a much-needed empirical grounding to this policy debate. The core findings challenge conventional wisdom, asserting that transport infrastructure construction is generally not an effective nationwide employment policy instrument. This counter-intuitive conclusion is attributed to structural issues, specifically insufficient labor supply within the relevant engineering and construction sectors, suggesting that an increase in labor supply, rather than merely demand, would be necessary for broader national employment gains. However, the study importantly differentiates between national and regional effects, highlighting that while the national net impact might approach zero, the gross regional employment impacts remain valuable information for localized project planning and community benefit considerations. The significant contribution of this research lies in its empirical validation of assessment methods and the subsequent development of a methodological framework designed to contextualize the complex employment impacts of infrastructure projects. By testing methods against known project outcomes, the paper adds credibility and practical utility to the field. The proposed framework promises to guide practitioners and policymakers in conducting more accurate and nuanced employment impact assessments, moving beyond simplistic justifications to foster more informed investment decisions that consider both national economic realities and crucial regional benefits.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.