David Forsdyke

The Roads of Bathurst

Introduction

The roads of bathurst. Explore the historical evolution of Bathurst's roads from its 1820 founding by Sir Rufane Donkin and Johannes Knobel's original survey. Discover 200 years of change.

Abstract

When Sir Rufane Donkin decided to establish the new town of Bathurst in May 1820, Johannes Knobel, the Government Surveyor, was instructed to create a plan. He must have started with a completely blank canvas, as there was nothing in the area at that time to act as the central focal point for the project, except a possible crossing of two rough tracks. These must have been very basic tracks at that time and it is interesting to see how they have evolved (or not) in the last 200 years.

Review

This abstract presents an intriguing historical-geographical study focused on the foundational infrastructure of Bathurst, South Africa. The premise of examining the genesis and subsequent development of the town's initial road network, originating from what was essentially a "blank canvas" save for a rudimentary crossing of two tracks, offers a compelling starting point. The stated scope—tracking the evolution (or lack thereof) over 200 years—promises a rich diachronic analysis, connecting early surveying decisions by Johannes Knobel under Sir Rufane Donkin's directive to contemporary urban patterns. This deep dive into the initial design and subsequent organic growth (or stagnation) of a settlement's circulatory system is a topic of considerable interest for urban historians and historical geographers. The potential contribution of this work lies in its ability to illuminate the long-term impact of foundational planning decisions, or the lack thereof, on urban form and function. By focusing on the "evolution (or not)" of these early tracks, the paper could offer valuable insights into resilience, adaptability, and path dependency within urban development. It has the potential to demonstrate how early, perhaps even informal, infrastructure decisions can shape a town's identity and connectivity for centuries. Furthermore, it could serve as a micro-history illustrating broader principles of colonial settlement planning, the role of surveyors, and the interplay between natural landscape and human intervention in shaping built environments. While the abstract clearly sets the historical stage and outlines the subject matter, a full review would benefit from a more explicit indication of the methodology and analytical framework. Specifically, it would be valuable to understand what primary sources (e.g., early maps, surveyor's notes, archival documents, photographs, modern mapping data) will be employed to track the roads' evolution. Further, the criteria for assessing "evolution" versus "non-evolution" should be clarified. What constitutes a significant change, or a lack thereof? Finally, the paper could strengthen its broader appeal by articulating the specific research questions it aims to answer and the theoretical or comparative insights it expects to generate beyond the historical narrative of Bathurst itself.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.