Danisma Danisma, Rocky Nathaniel R Sales

The Influence of Leadership, Work Culture, and Performance Assessment in Improving the Quality of Education: A Literature Review of SLR

Introduction

The influence of leadership, work culture, and performance assessment in improving the quality of education: a literature review of slr. Discover how leadership, work culture, and performance assessment critically influence educational quality. This SLR reviews 2020-2024 studies, highlighting effective strategies for improvement.

Abstract

Leadership is an important element in supporting improving the quality of education. This research aims to identify the Influence of Leadership, Work Culture, and Performance Assessment in Improving the Quality of Education. The method used in this study is Systematic Literature Review (SLR) which is taken from articles published in 2020 to 2024 by collecting and analyzing journals related to keywords. The results of this study show that leadership, work culture, and performance assessment have a significant role in improving the quality of education. In education Effective leadership can motivate teachers and staff, a positive work culture encourages a sense of community, which both ensures understanding and involvement of all parties, while performance appraisals help identify strengths and areas for improvement and of course this can affect the quality of education. The leadership of the principal is essentially a principal who understands and masters managerial and effective leadership abilities as acronymized as the principal as a leader (educator, manager, administrator, supervisor, leader, innovator, and motivator). However, it is still a general problem that educational institutions experience several obstacles in improving the quality of education. The purpose of this study is to describe the literature in general, analyze the themes studied in several articles, and classify the limitations of the research and look for future research opportunities The combination of effective leadership, positive work culture, strategic communication, and continuous performance appraisal is the main foundation in improving the quality of education. This research makes a significant contribution to Digital Literature on leadership, work culture, and assessment of educational quality performance. Keywords: Leadership, Work Culture, Performance Assessment, Improving the Quality of Education

Review

This literature review, titled "The Influence of Leadership, Work Culture, and Performance Assessment in Improving the Quality of Education: A Literature Review of SLR," addresses a highly pertinent and critical area within educational management. The paper’s objective to systematically identify how leadership, work culture, and performance assessment collectively contribute to enhancing educational quality is commendable. Utilizing a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) methodology drawing from articles published between 2020 and 2024 ensures a contemporary and relevant synthesis of current research. The abstract effectively highlights the key findings, asserting that these three elements play a significant role, with effective leadership motivating staff, a positive work culture fostering community, and performance appraisals identifying areas for improvement, all of which are crucial for educational advancement. While the abstract clearly articulates the importance of the topic and the general findings, it lacks critical detail regarding the execution of the SLR itself, which is a fundamental expectation for this methodology. Specifically, there is no mention of the search strategy employed (e.g., databases used, specific search strings), the number of articles ultimately included in the review, or the criteria for their inclusion and exclusion. Furthermore, the abstract's "results" section, while descriptive of the positive impact of the variables, reads more like a general consensus or an introduction to the topic rather than a distilled synthesis of findings *from the reviewed literature*. The inclusion of the "principal as a leader" acronym and the general statement about "obstacles in improving the quality of education" feel somewhat disconnected from a concise summary of SLR findings and might be better placed in the introduction or discussion of a full paper. Despite these methodological gaps in the abstract's presentation, the study promises a valuable contribution to the existing body of knowledge on educational leadership and quality improvement. The identified synergy between leadership, work culture, communication, and performance appraisal as a foundational framework for enhancing education is a powerful insight with practical implications for school administrators and policymakers. For the full paper to maximize its impact and credibility, it would be imperative to provide rigorous detail on the SLR methodology, present a more structured synthesis of the reviewed literature's findings, and clearly delineate the specific themes and limitations identified from the analysis of the selected articles. Addressing these points will significantly strengthen the paper's scholarly contribution and its utility for future research and practice in education.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.