Wahyudi, Mohamad Riyad Mintarja, Nuryamin, Diana Farid, Muhammad Husni Abdulah Pakarti, Ais Surasa

Tanggungjawab Hukum Institusi Rehabilitasi Medis Bagi Penyalahguna Narkoba

Introduction

Tanggungjawab hukum institusi rehabilitasi medis bagi penyalahguna narkoba. Mengkaji tanggungjawab hukum institusi rehabilitasi medis bagi penyalahguna narkoba. Penelitian kualitatif ini mengukur efektivitas layanan rehabilitasi medis & faktor pengaruhnya, sesuai Permenkes No. 4/2020.

Abstract

This research aims to measure the effectiveness of medical rehabilitation services provided by mandatory reporting institutions. Medical rehabilitation for drug addicts and substance abusers is a comprehensive effort aimed at freeing individuals involved in drug abuse from addiction. This rehabilitation can be carried out in healthcare facilities recognized and selected by the Ministry of Health, including Government and private healthcare facilities in collaboration with the government in providing drug rehabilitation services. Medical rehabilitation services play a crucial role in helping individuals who have committed legal violations reintegrate into society. This study adopts a qualitative research approach by implementing in-depth interviews with medical staff, rehabilitation participants, and institution supervisors. The research findings indicate that the effectiveness of medical rehabilitation services is significantly influenced by factors such as the competence of medical staff, the organized rehabilitation programs, support from various relevant parties, and hindering factors. The provision of medical rehabilitation services for drug addicts and substance abusers is regulated by the Minister of Health Regulation Number 4 of 2020 concerning the Implementation of Mandatory Reporting Institution, where Standard Operating Procedures have been well-established and defined to operate efficiently and optimally of medical rehabilitation services provided by Mandatory Reporting Institutions.

Review

This paper addresses a highly pertinent issue: the effectiveness of medical rehabilitation services provided by mandatory reporting institutions for drug abusers and substance addicts. Given the complex societal challenges associated with drug addiction and the crucial role of rehabilitation in both individual recovery and social reintegration, this research topic is of significant public health and legal interest. The abstract clearly establishes the context, emphasizing the comprehensive nature of rehabilitation efforts and the foundational role of healthcare facilities recognized by the Ministry of Health, governed by Minister of Health Regulation Number 4 of 2020. Methodologically, the study employs a qualitative research approach, utilizing in-depth interviews with a diverse range of stakeholders, including medical staff, rehabilitation participants, and institution supervisors. This multi-perspective approach is commendable for its potential to yield rich, nuanced insights into the complexities of rehabilitation service delivery. The key findings highlight several critical factors influencing service effectiveness: the competence of medical staff, the organization of rehabilitation programs, support from relevant parties, and various hindering factors. The existence of well-established Standard Operating Procedures is noted as a positive aspect of the current system, suggesting a structured framework for service provision. However, a notable point of divergence emerges between the paper's title, "Tanggungjawab Hukum Institusi Rehabilitasi Medis Bagi Penyalahguna Narkoba" (Legal Responsibility of Medical Rehabilitation Institutions for Drug Abusers), and the content summarized in the abstract. While the abstract thoroughly details the measurement of service effectiveness, influencing factors, and the regulatory framework for implementation, it does not explicitly delve into the *legal responsibilities*, liabilities, or accountability mechanisms of these institutions as the title strongly implies. For the paper to fully align with its stated title, it should explicitly connect the findings on operational effectiveness to the legal obligations and potential liabilities of the institutions. Conversely, if the primary focus is indeed on service effectiveness and implementation, a revision of the title might be beneficial to accurately reflect the paper's scope and primary contributions. This clarification would significantly enhance the coherence and impact of the research.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.