Owner : Riset dan Jurnal Akuntansi

Regulation: Kewajiban Plagiarism Check / Similarity Check

Introduction

Regulation: kewajiban plagiarism check / similarity check. Pahami regulasi dan kewajiban melakukan plagiarism/similarity check. Lindungi integritas akademik dan hindari pelanggaran dalam lingkungan pendidikan.

Abstract

Review

The title, "Regulation: Kewajiban Plagiarism Check / Similarity Check," immediately signals a paper addressing a highly pertinent and critical issue within contemporary academia: the mandatory implementation of plagiarism and similarity checks. Academic integrity and research ethics are foundational pillars of scholarly work, and the increasing reliance on technological tools for upholding these standards warrants robust discussion and analysis. This paper's focus on "regulation" and "obligation" (Kewajiban, indicating a mandatory aspect, likely in an Indonesian context) suggests an exploration into the legal, institutional, or policy frameworks that either exist or should exist to ensure the originality of scholarly output. The topic is undeniably relevant to academic institutions, research councils, policymakers, and individual researchers striving to maintain high ethical standards. However, the complete absence of an abstract presents a significant impediment to conducting a thorough and meaningful review. An abstract is the cornerstone of a scholarly article, providing crucial insights into the paper's specific research question, the methodology employed, the key arguments or findings, and the scope of its contribution. Without this fundamental summary, it is impossible to ascertain whether the paper offers an empirical study, a theoretical analysis, a legal review, a comparative study of different regulatory approaches, or a critical discussion of the challenges and benefits associated with mandatory similarity checks. Consequently, any assessment of the paper's scholarly rigor, originality, or potential impact would be purely speculative, based solely on the broad topic outlined in the title. To enable proper evaluation and comprehension, it is imperative for this paper to include a comprehensive abstract that clearly articulates its objectives, methods, and main conclusions. Such a summary would allow reviewers and readers to quickly grasp the essence of the work, understand its contribution to the existing literature on academic integrity and regulation, and assess its potential implications. Assuming the paper delivers a well-researched and argued analysis consistent with its important title, it has the potential to make a valuable contribution to discussions surrounding best practices in academic integrity and the role of regulatory frameworks in fostering an environment of original scholarship, particularly within contexts where such "kewajiban" (obligation) is being considered or implemented.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.