Bintang Pratama Putra, Nora Eka Putri

Penerapan Prinsip Good Governance terhadap Masalah Sertifikat Ganda oleh BPN Kota Padang

Introduction

Penerapan prinsip good governance terhadap masalah sertifikat ganda oleh bpn kota padang. BPN Padang terapkan good governance tangani sertifikat ganda. Digitalisasi belum optimal akibat data dan koordinasi lemah. Solusi: tata kelola terintegrasi tingkatkan kepercayaan publik.

Abstract

Duplicate land titles remain a critical land issue in Indonesia, causing legal uncertainty and undermining public trust. This study examines how the Padang City National Land Agency (BPN) applies good governance principles—transparency, accountability, and work effectiveness—in addressing these cases. Using a descriptive qualitative method with interviews, observations, and documentation, the study finds that BPN's efforts, including digital tools such as the Sentuh Tanahku application and Bhumi website, have not been fully effective. Key challenges include incomplete land data, limited public digital literacy, and weak internal coordination. The findings highlight the need for integrated digital governance and improved service responsiveness to resolve land title conflicts and enhance public trust.

Review

This study addresses the critical and persistent issue of duplicate land titles in Indonesia, specifically focusing on the efforts of the Padang City National Land Agency (BPN). The research aims to evaluate the application of good governance principles—transparency, accountability, and work effectiveness—by BPN in resolving these complex cases. Employing a descriptive qualitative methodology, data was collected through interviews, observations, and documentation. The abstract indicates that despite BPN's implementation of digital tools such as the Sentuh Tanahku application and Bhumi website, their effectiveness in fully addressing the problem remains limited. The relevance of this study is undeniable, given that duplicate land titles cause significant legal uncertainty and erode public trust across Indonesia. By specifically examining the lens of good governance principles, the research provides a structured framework for analyzing administrative effectiveness. A key strength lies in its identification of specific barriers to resolution, including incomplete land data, limited public digital literacy, and internal coordination weaknesses, which are crucial insights for policy formulation. The acknowledgment of BPN's efforts with digital tools also highlights an important step towards modernization, even if implementation challenges persist. The findings strongly advocate for integrated digital governance and improved service responsiveness, offering clear actionable recommendations. While the abstract presents a concise overview of the problem and BPN's efforts, future iterations or the full paper could benefit from elaborating on the specific mechanisms through which the digital tools were intended to improve governance, and perhaps a deeper dive into *why* public digital literacy is low or *how* internal coordination specifically falters. Considering the study's qualitative nature and focus on a single city, exploring comparative analyses with other regions or longitudinal studies on the impact of digital initiatives could further enrich the findings and enhance generalizability. Nonetheless, this research makes a valuable contribution by shedding light on persistent administrative challenges in land management and provides a solid foundation for policy interventions aimed at improving public services and trust in land administration agencies nationwide.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.