Katiele Daiana da Silva Rehbein

La ley n.º 15.355 de 11 de marzo de 2026 y la consolidación del Derecho de los desastres multiespecie en Brasil

Introduction

La ley n.º 15.355 de 11 de marzo de 2026 y la consolidación del derecho de los desastres multiespecie en brasil . Investiga la Ley 15.355/2026 y el Derecho de Desastres Multiespecie en Brasil. Analiza la protección animal en emergencias y la posición de Brasil ante tendencias globales comparadas.

Abstract

La investigación indaga si es posible reconocer, en el ordenamiento jurídico brasileño vigente, la configuración de un Derecho de los Desastres Multiespecie y, en este contexto, si el país acompaña, anticipa o permanece a la zaga de las tendencias internacionales de integración de la dimensión animal en la gobernanza de desastres. Para ello, se examinan la intensificación de los desastres en la sociedad del riesgo, las experiencias internacionales de protección animal en contextos de emergencia, desastres emblemáticos en Brasil y la trayectoria legislativa culminante en la Ley n.º 15.355/2026. Metodológicamente, la investigación se estructura a partir del cuadrinomio teoría de base del riesgo, Derecho de los Desastres y Derecho Animal, enfoque deductivo, procedimiento bibliográfico y documental, y las técnicas de fichaje y síntesis. Se concluye que el ordenamiento jurídico brasileño admite la configuración de un Derecho de los Desastres Multiespecie y que Brasil se posiciona entre las experiencias más avanzadas, en perspectiva comparada.

Review

This paper addresses the timely and critical emergence of multi-species disaster law within the Brazilian legal framework, a topic of increasing global relevance given the intensifying frequency and impact of environmental disasters. The central inquiry into whether Brazil's legal system accommodates such a specialized field, and how its approach aligns with international trends, is both pertinent and ambitious. By focusing on the trajectory culminating in Law n.º 15.355/2026, the research positions itself to offer a forward-looking analysis of legislative efforts to integrate animal dimensions into disaster governance, marking a significant step towards more inclusive and holistic emergency preparedness and response. Methodologically, the investigation promises a robust, interdisciplinary approach, drawing from the "quadrinomial" of risk theory, disaster law, and animal law. This integrated framework, coupled with a deductive approach and extensive bibliographical and documentary procedures, suggests a thorough examination of the subject matter. The proposed analysis spans several crucial areas, including the global context of disaster intensification, a comparative review of international animal protection strategies in emergencies, and an examination of specific emblematic disasters within Brazil. This multifaceted analysis is well-suited to provide a comprehensive understanding of the legal landscape and its practical implications. The preliminary findings, indicating that Brazilian law *admits* the configuration of multi-species disaster law and that Brazil is among the most advanced nations in this comparative perspective, suggest a significant contribution to both academic discourse and policy-making. Should these conclusions be substantiated by the full research, the paper would not only illuminate the specific contours of multi-species disaster law in Brazil but also provide valuable insights and a potential blueprint for other nations grappling with similar challenges. This makes the work particularly valuable for scholars, practitioners, and policymakers engaged in disaster risk reduction, animal welfare, and environmental law on a global scale.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.