Aris Munandar, Chrisdianto Eko Purnomo, Haeruman Jayadi, Riska Ari Amalia

KETIDAKPATUHAN DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 TENTANG UNDANG-UNDANG CIPTA KERJA)

Introduction

Ketidakpatuhan dewan perwakilan rakyat terhadap putusan mahkamah konstitusi (studi putusan nomor 91/puu-xviii/2020 tentang undang-undang cipta kerja). Kaji ketidakpatuhan DPR terhadap Putusan MK No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 mengenai UU Cipta Kerja. Temukan analisis hukum normatif dan dampaknya pada kepastian hukum serta legitimasi DPR di Indonesia.

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji ketidakpatuhan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII 2020 tentang Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. mengenai kepastian hukum didalamnya terkait pelaksanaan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Jenis penelitian adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Adapun pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini, yaitu 1). Pendekatan Perundang-undangan (Statute Approach), 2). Pendekatan Konseptual (Conceptual Approach). Sumber bahan hukum yang diperoleh dari kepustakaan (research document) Jenis bahan hukum adalah hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Analisis bahan hukum menggunakan penelitian normatif, sehingga peneliti akan melakukan suatu penafsiran-penafsiran dan kajian-kajian untuk menelaah bahan hukum yang diperoleh untuk menghasilkan uraian sistematis dan terstruktur, serta menjawab rumusan masalah. Adapun hasil penelitian antara lain 1). Ketidakpatuhan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 didasarkan pada kelemahan dalam mekanisme pengawasan serta kecenderungan politik legislasi yang mengutamakan kepentingan tertentu. DPR tidak sepenuhnya menjalankan perintah Mahkamah Konstitusi untuk memperbaiki prosedur pembentukan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja sesuai prinsip partisipasi publik yang bermakna. 2). Akibat dari ketidakpatuhan ini, secara hukum, Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja tetap berlaku tetapi berpotensi digugat kembali, menciptakan ketidakpastian hukum bagi investor dan masyarakat. Selain itu, legitimasi DPR dalam proses legislasi semakin dipertanyakan, yang dapat melemahkan kepercayaan publik terhadap sistem hukum dan demokrasi di Indonesia.

Review

The submitted paper, "KETIDAKPATUHAN DEWAN PERWAKILAN RAKYAT TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 TENTANG UNDANG-UNDANG CIPTA KERJA)," addresses a highly pertinent and critical issue within Indonesia's constitutional framework: the non-compliance of the legislature with binding decisions of the Constitutional Court. Focusing specifically on Decision No. 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 concerning the Job Creation Law (UU Cipta Kerja), the study aims to examine the legal certainty surrounding the implementation of this significant court ruling. Employing a normative legal research methodology, utilizing statute and conceptual approaches, the research seeks to provide a systematic and structured analysis of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, a suitable framework for such a deep dive into legal interpretation and constitutional compliance. The research effectively identifies two primary findings regarding the Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat's (DPR) non-compliance. Firstly, it attributes this disregard to inherent weaknesses in oversight mechanisms and a legislative political tendency prioritizing specific interests, leading to a failure to uphold principles of meaningful public participation in law-making as mandated by the Constitutional Court. This insight is crucial for understanding the practical challenges in ensuring democratic and participatory legislative processes. Secondly, the study meticulously outlines the severe consequences of such non-compliance: the Job Creation Law, despite its legal vulnerabilities, remains in effect, creating ongoing legal uncertainty for both investors and the public. Furthermore, the paper rightly highlights the erosion of the DPR's legitimacy and the potential weakening of public trust in Indonesia's legal and democratic institutions, underscoring the systemic repercussions of legislative defiance. This paper makes a valuable contribution to the discourse on constitutional accountability and the rule of law in Indonesia. Its strength lies in clearly articulating a complex and politically charged issue, drawing a direct link between legislative action (or inaction) and its profound impact on legal certainty, institutional legitimacy, and public confidence. The findings offer a compelling diagnostic of challenges within the Indonesian legislative landscape, particularly concerning the balance of power and the sanctity of judicial review. While the abstract sufficiently details the problem and its consequences, the implicit call for greater institutional accountability and procedural integrity resonates strongly. This work is highly recommended for its timely analysis and its potential to stimulate further scholarly and policy discussions on strengthening democratic governance and adherence to constitutional mandates in Indonesia.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.