Ajeet Singh

Alternating Between Flow and Reflexivity: Transformational Dramaturgy of Boal and Semiotic Autonomy of Spect-actor

Introduction

Alternating between flow and reflexivity: transformational dramaturgy of boal and semiotic autonomy of spect-actor. Explore Boal's Theatre of the Oppressed and transformational dramaturgy. Discover how spect-actors oscillate between flow and reflexivity, achieving semiotic autonomy through interruption.

Abstract

In experimental modes of performance and especially Postdramatic theatre, the question of spectatorship has become the core of theatrical aesthetics. In his Theatre of the Oppressed, Augusto Boal introduced a transformational dramaturgy derived from Brechtian aesthetics, in which theatre is treated as ‘event’ and performed through  devices of ‘interruption’, ‘dialogism’, ‘polyvocality’, ‘detachment’ and ‘de-representation’. Boal modeled his audience members ‘Spect-actors’ who when invited on stage oscillate between ‘flow and ‘reflexivity’; between the character and speaking about the character. This paper explores Boal’s theoretical framework in an attempt to reveal how his unique style of performance transforms a spectator into an actor who transports between the ‘real world’ and ‘world of performance’. The paper reveals how the use of interruption as a technique enables the spectator to use/deploy his/her intellectual and semiotic capabilities. The paper explores the significance of ‘interruption’ as theatrical device in liberating the spectator through restoring his/her semiotic autonomy.  

Review

This paper offers a compelling theoretical exploration of spectatorship within Augusto Boal's Theatre of the Oppressed, positioning it as a significant contribution to discussions on postdramatic theatre aesthetics. The central argument articulates how Boal's transformational dramaturgy, rooted in Brechtian aesthetics and employing devices such as 'interruption', 'dialogism', and 'detachment', cultivates a unique mode of engagement for the 'Spect-actor'. The author effectively outlines how Boal’s framework invites audience members to oscillate between states of 'flow' and 'reflexivity', thereby blurring the lines between performer and observer and facilitating a profound transport between the 'real world' and the 'world of performance'. A particular strength of this paper lies in its focused analysis of 'interruption' as a critical theatrical device. By illuminating how this technique enables the spect-actor to deploy their intellectual and semiotic capabilities, the paper significantly advances our understanding of Boal's methods beyond a purely political or pedagogical interpretation. The conceptualization of 'semiotic autonomy' as a liberated state achieved through such interruptions is a compelling contribution, offering a nuanced perspective on the transformative potential of participatory theatre. This analytical depth successfully bridges the practical application of Boal's work with broader theoretical discussions on agency and intellectual engagement within performance contexts. While the abstract clearly articulates the paper's primary focus and contribution, a comprehensive exploration might benefit from further elaboration on certain aspects. Specifically, delving into the practical manifestations and potential variations of this 'semiotic autonomy' in diverse theatrical settings, or discussing potential challenges and limitations in achieving this oscillation for *all* spect-actors, could enrich the argument. Additionally, a more explicit discussion of the precise mechanisms through which this semiotic autonomy translates into tangible transformation in the spect-actor's engagement with the 'real world' post-performance would further strengthen the paper's broader implications. Nevertheless, the paper presents a robust theoretical framework for understanding the profound agency inherent in Boal's innovative approach to theatre.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.