Nurul Islamiah, Nurhafidhah, Firdayanti, Tiara, Adriani, Rezki Aulia Pratiwi

AI dalam Manajemen Pengelolaan Pembelajaran di SD/MI

Introduction

Ai dalam manajemen pengelolaan pembelajaran di sd/mi. Telusuri peran AI dalam manajemen pembelajaran di SD/MI menghadapi kurikulum yang sering berubah. Pelajari strategi guru menyiapkan generasi Society 5.0 di sekolah dasar.

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memahami bagaimana seorang guru dalam mengatur pengelolahan pembelajaran didalam kelas di SD/MI, karena kurikulum yang sering berubah-ubah sehingga guru sulit mengatur atau mengelolah pembelajaran didalam kelas. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kepustakaan atau Library Research dengan bahan penelitian yang bersumber dari sumber-sumber pustaka seperti buku, Artikel, prosiding dan bahan penelitian lainnya. Teknik analisis yang digunakan adalah Content Analysis dilakukan secara detail dan mendalam yang digunakan untuk mengambil kesimpulan dengan mengidentifikasi berbagai kriteria khusus secara sistematis, general dan objektif dari buku, artikel dan prosiding. Pendidikan memegang peranan yang sangat penting dalam membangun Masyarakat 5.0 ini. Sehingga untuk memasukinya tentu dibutuhkan persiapan. Untuk itu pemerintah telah memberikan perhatian dalam hal ini dengan menyasar generasi millennial yang akan menghadapi era society 5.0 tersebut di masanya. Kurikulum pendidikan nasional dirancang dan dikembangkan dengan fokus menyiapkan kualitas anak didik sebagai generasi yang akan mengisi era society 5.0 tersebut.

Review

The paper, titled "AI dalam Manajemen Pengelolaan Pembelajaran di SD/MI," proposes to investigate the role of Artificial Intelligence in learning management within Indonesian primary schools (SD/MI). This is a highly relevant and timely topic given the increasing integration of technology into education. However, the accompanying abstract presents a significant disconnect from this central theme. Instead of elaborating on how AI is explored, the abstract primarily discusses teacher challenges stemming from frequently changing curricula and the broader importance of education in preparing for Society 5.0, particularly for the millennial generation. While these are valid educational concerns, their explicit mention *without any reference to AI* raises immediate questions about the paper's actual scope and focus. The primary concern lies in the complete absence of "AI" within the abstract's description of the research. The abstract outlines a study aiming to understand how teachers manage learning amidst curriculum changes, and then shifts to the role of education in preparing for Society 5.0. It states the methodology as "Library Research" utilizing various textual sources and "Content Analysis" for drawing conclusions. While Library Research and Content Analysis are appropriate for literature reviews, the abstract fails to specify *what literature* pertaining to AI in primary school learning management will be analyzed. The generic description of content analysis further compounds this issue, leaving the reader unclear about the specific criteria or framework used to investigate the *titled* subject. This fundamental misalignment between the title's promise and the abstract's content severely undermines the perceived coherence and purpose of the study as presented. To improve the clarity and academic rigor of this submission, significant revisions are required. The most crucial step is to resolve the discrepancy between the title and the abstract. If the paper genuinely explores AI in learning management, the abstract *must* be rewritten to explicitly detail how AI is conceptualized, the specific AI applications or aspects relevant to SD/MI, and how the literature review will address these. Conversely, if the actual focus is on teacher challenges with curriculum changes and preparing for Society 5.0, the title needs to be revised to accurately reflect these themes. Furthermore, the abstract should clearly articulate a specific research question or objective that directly links the chosen methodology to the study's stated aim, providing a concrete roadmap for the research undertaken. Without these fundamental clarifications, the paper's contribution to the field remains ambiguous and unfocused.

Full Text

Comments

You need to be logged in to post a comment.